Free will is not necessary for response. Choice is not necessary for response. Stimulus-response is observed in plants, and can be trained into simple animals. Arguments that animals have displayed free will are often pooh-poohed with the claim that what's been observed is just a response to a stimulus.
Free will is not necessary for response. Choice is not necessary for response. Stimulus-response is observed in plants, and can be trained into simple animals. Arguments that animals have displayed free will are often pooh-poohed with the claim that what's been observed is just a response to a stimulus.
Taking Tylenol in reponse to an injury has been observed in humans. Denying that would be absurd. Saying that it's not response because there's "no choice" is likewise absurd. Look at how the word is used.
Free will is not necessary for response. Choice is not necessary for response. Stimulus-response is observed in plants, and can be trained into simple animals. Arguments that animals have displayed free will are often pooh-poohed with the claim that what's been observed is just a response to a stimulus.
Taking Tylenol in reponse to an injury has been observed in humans. Denying that would be absurd. Saying that it's not response because there's "no choice" is likewise absurd. Look at how the word is used.