There seem to be a whole lot of people who think it's not wrong to harm someone for a tiny benefit, based upon what I think it means to choose to cause harm, namely people who make a strong active-passive distinction and think "allowing" preventable horrific suffering isn't causing.
There seem to be a whole lot of people who think it's not wrong to harm someone for a tiny benefit, based upon what I think it means to choose to cause harm, namely people who make a strong active-passive distinction and think "allowing" preventable horrific suffering isn't causing.
There seem to be a whole lot of people who think it's not wrong to harm someone for a tiny benefit, based upon what I think it means to choose to cause harm, namely people who make a strong active-passive distinction and think "allowing" preventable horrific suffering isn't causing.