Discussion about this post

User's avatar
name12345's avatar

I used to be optimistic, not just about America, but about modern society in general. From Matt Ridley's book, The Rational Optimist, to Steven Pinker's book, Enlightenment Now, and others (Goklany, Lomborg, etc.), the logic was simple: as you've done in this post, let's just look at the historical evidence until today; most important things are getting spectacularly better and they are likely to continue to do so.

The COVID lockdowns shook me. I think it's even worse than whether or not America is failing. Nearly all the world's governments turned most of the world into a prison for a non-catastrophic virus. The lockdowns were temporary but the precedent has been set. The U.S. Constitution was discarded, so in that sense, America has failed, but it's worse than that. The global coordination of immoral laws based on poor science was the most worrying. We're on the precipice of a global, cyberpunk dystopia.

No longer can we indulge in a Voltairian or Caplanian Bubblism and enjoy increasing living standards while largely ignoring the government. The government cancer is, through institutional inertia, probing terminal metastasis. This does not necessarily mean that progress in well-being, science, technology, and culture will slow. Cyberpunk dystopic writers were prescient in how their imagined worlds were technologically advanced.

Most people are in denial about the magnitude of the global COVID lockdowns by governments that we just lived through, and what they portend.

Expand full comment
Travis Monteleone's avatar

The question is, why is the "America is failing" narrative so incredibly popular? As you and plenty of others have laid out, the data clearly supports the fact that in many ways, life is better now around the world, and in the U.S. in particular, than it ever has been. Why does no one seem to care?

I'd be interested in other thoughts, but I think there's a case to be made that the success of the "America is failing" narrative can be chalked up solely to negativity bias and our collective addiction to negative talking points.

In a world of pure rationalists, the data and arguments that paint an optimistic picture of where we are would win out. Unfortunately, we don't live in that world. Humans are driven by negativity bias to a much larger extent than most realize. As long as we continue to give more psychological weight to negative talking points and data, articles like this will be drowned out by a sea of negativity.

The fight against overly-negative narratives, and the hyperpolarization these narratives cause, can't be won with more or better data. Until we recognize and push back against our addiction to negativity, negative narratives and talking points will continue to win in the marketplace of ideas.

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts